Jesus for Everyone

This blog is to supplement the current teaching series through the Gospel of Luke at Beaverton Foursquare Church, in Beaverton, Oregon. We are providing weekly self-study/digging deeper questions for those desiring to go beyond the scope of the sermon in your exploration of the complete passage. We are also providing links to the sermon introduction videos filmed for this series on-location in Israel. Our prayer is that we can better learn how to live and love like Jesus this year!

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Week 13 "Fruitful or Just Frightful?"




Text: This week we’re covering Luke 6:27-49 dealing with Jesus’ intensely counter-cultural teaching to his disciples on life in the Kingdom of God in the form of loving your enemies, judging, forgiving, giving, hypocritical blind spots, personal fruitfulness, and building your life to survive life’s storms.

Other passages to read: We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel to our text from Luke:
·         Love your Enemies: Matthew 5:38-48; John 3:16-17, and 15:9-13
·         Judging Others: Matthew 7:1-6; Romans 14; John 3:18-21
·         Hypocritical Blind spots: Deut. 27:18; Isaiah 42:16; Matthew 15:13
·         A Tree and its Fruit: Matthew 7:15-20; and 12:34-37; John 15:1-8, 16
·         Build your house on the Rock: Matthew 7:21-29; Isaiah 28:14-18; Ezekiel 33:29-33

Other Resources: This week’s recommended resource is another book by Kenneth E. Bailey, actually two books in one: Poet & Peasant and Through Peasant Eyes. It focuses at a little deeper level on the Literary-Cultural approach used by Luke, focusing especially on the parables. We have a copy of this book in our library for checkout.

Sermon Notes: Jesus for Everyone: Come. Trust. Obey. - Today's message given by Pastor Ezra Stanton
 
Read Luke 6:43-45
  • Luke 18:19
  • Romans 3:23
  • Romans 5:12
  • Gal 5:19-23
  • 2 Corinthians 5:17 – 21
  • Galatians 5:24-25

Read Luke 6:46-49Luke 6:47
  1. Come to Jesus.
  2. Trust Jesus.
  3. Obey Jesus.
Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
  • How was this message counter-cultural in Jesus’ day? How is it counter-cultural today?
  • How would our society be changed if we actually lived this way? How would we be changed?
  • In what other contexts can we find this expression “with the measure you use”? List them.
  • Why is it that we seem incapable of seeing the “log” in our own eye but can so easily see the “speck” in everyone else’s? What is the biblical solution for this?
  • To what is the “good treasure of his heart” in v. 45 referring?
  • What is the underlying meta-issue in all these different topics addressed by Jesus?
Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater application of what we learn about Jesus…
  • Of the major issues, attitudes, and behaviors listed in this section of Luke 6, which is most surprising to you?
  • Take time to evaluate how you are doing with each of the major issues…is it a point of strength, an opportunity for growth, or an opportunity for repentance?
  • If the people you spend the most time with were asked about you, would they say you are “fruitful” or just “frightful”?
  • Jesus makes it clear that storms will come…and they do! What is the foundation of our lives? Is it solid enough to keep us secure even if the great rivers of culture, politics, and economics should break against it?
  • If, as Jesus says, the measure we use is the measure we will receive back…what measure do we regularly use? 
Commentary & Quotes:
Our featured commentator is once again Kenneth E. Bailey who describes the many different literary structures we find in the Bible.

 "The sayings of Jesus often employ a series of three-line stanzas. An example of this is in Luke 6:32-36:
1
“If you love those who love you,
   what credit is that to you?
      For even sinners love those who love them.


2
And if you do good to those who do good to you,
   what credit is that to you?
      For even sinners do the same.


3
And if you lend to those from whom you expect to receive,
   what credit is that to you?
      Even sinners lend to sinners, to get back the same amount.


4
But love your enemies,
   do good,
      and lend expecting nothing in return
             (and your reward will be great).

The last stanza is a three-line recapitualation of the first three."
(Bailey, Poet and Peasant, Eerdmans, 1983, p.72)


The following treatment of the "Golden Rule" (6:31) if from Greg Dueker's Do You See Him: Expositional Studies from the New Testament,




The Chain-Reaction Relationship Scenario
We all know that it is our nature to treat others in the same way that we are ourselves treated. If someone treats us poorly we are more likely to treat them badly, unless it is not safe to do so (i.e., they are in a position of authority), in which case we take it out on someone else, someone "safe". That chain reaction of treating others the way we have been treated, when we think that we can get away with it, has often been seen in story form. For instance there is the story of the Jones family and their bad day.

The Jones family's bad day began by Mr. Jones having a bad day. He was bawled out by his boss in front of the other employees and to make matters worse he was driving home that evening and traffic on the freeway was horrible. When he got off the freeway and began to drive the rest of the way home a man came up behind him, tailgating, honking his horn, and calling Mr. Jones bad names. He must have thought that Mr. Jones was driving too slow (I wonder what had made that man's day so bad?) Mr. Jones was so mad that he stomped on the gas and sped home, stopping only once to get a speeding ticket and a lecture from a local police officer. The stage is now set, to see how he responds to someone else. When Mr. Jones got home, his wife greeted him at the door (her day had been hectic and she was looking forward to her husband's return so she could talk) and asked about his day. Mr. Jones did not want to talk about it and said so, rudely, to his wife and threw his coat on the chair as he stomped past on his way to take a shower. Mrs. Jones was hurt, frustrated and angry. It was at this inopportune moment that their young son asked, for the fourth time, "Mom, when will dinner be ready? What are we having? Whatever it is it smells gross." Mrs. Jones suddenly snapped back, "I'm tired of your questions and complaining. It will be ready when it's done and you will eat it whether you like it or not! Now go to your room!" On his way to his room, feeling angry and hurt, little Tommy passed his sister in the hall and punched her in the arm and told her that she was a lousy sister. At this point Suzie Jones, Tommy's little sister, went out to the garage to cry, and since there was no one else for her to take her anger and hurt out on, she kicked the dog. You probably think that it ended there, but the next day the dog bit the mailman and started the downward spiral all over again, this time spreading to the mailman's family as well. This kind of behavior is not honoring to God and we know that it grieves the Lord for Him to see His people treating each other in an unloving way. It is not His plan for us. He gave us a simple guideline, a rule that was to govern our lives as Christians. The world knows this rule too, but nobody seems to practice it as much as we should.

What is “The Golden Rule”? What does the Bible teach about it? I have found three passages in scripture where we are given the golden rule. In this lesson we will look briefly at the context of each of these three verses in an effort to understand more fully what the Golden Rule implies for the Christian today.

I) The Golden Rule – Following Jesus’ Example of Giving
A) What is the Golden Rule?
Matthew 7:12 "So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets."

Why is this verse said to contain the Golden Rule? Certainly it has nothing to do with gold, but instead with love. It may be called the golden rule because of the value of the teaching it contains—that if people would but keep such a rule the society would be very rich indeed, beyond the value of any worldly currency. Another more concrete explanation of the origin of the term as applied to this verse is as follows. This verse may be called the "Golden Rule" because Emperor Alexander Severus reputedly had it written in gold on the wall of his palace—some have noted that perhaps it would not be such a bad example to follow.

Some say that Jesus was not the first person to deal with this concept, this Golden Rule, as a similar idea is found in the writings of several ancient sources (i.e., Socrates, Aristotle, Confucius, Rabbi Hillel, etc.). However, all the sources that predate Christ's teaching are stated in the negative sense as we see in the words of Rabbi Hillel. He said, "What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor: that is the whole Torah, while the rest is commentary thereof."[1]

The general sense was that of "what you don't want people to do to you, then don't do it to them." The problem with all the previous statements of the great rule for living is that they are negative and passive. But as is the case with so much of Christ's teaching, He approached this ethic from the positive perspective. Jesus was the first to state this concept positively, and actively. As G. Campbell Morgan wrote,
"There is this radical difference--these [Hillel et al] are negative and passive; Christ's command is positive and active. These say to man, 'Stand still, and do not do what you do not want anyone to do to you'; Christ says, 'Go and do what you would that he should do to you.' It is not merely that you are to refrain from harming him; you are to do him good . . . We might, out of a selfish self-respect, decline to harm our neighbor but we cannot do this higher thing without power. We cannot do continuously what we would our neighbor should do to us save as we ask, seek, and knock, and know that our Father is pledged to us in power."[2]

In fact, Jesus went as far as to say that this teaching summed up the teaching of the Prophets, implying that it contained the total (though general) statement of God's will for the dealings of men with men.
"Jesus was apparently the first to formulate it explicitly, and he elevates it to a place of new importance: 'this is the law and the prophets', a summary of the revealed will of God."[3]

Jesus' statement proves that Hillel "missed the boat" when he said that his negative statement fulfilled all the Old Testament. To really fulfill the Old Testament one must not only abstain from evil but must be used for good. The point of the Abrahamic covenant was that all the world might be blessed through Abraham's descendants not merely that they would not be harmed by them. In order for us to see what it really is that we are supposed to be doing we need to examine the context of this great verse of Scripture.

"What you would have them do to you": I read a quote by George Bernard Shaw that made me think about the standard for the Golden Rule. He said, "Do not do unto others as you would that they should do unto you. Their tastes may not be the same." I'm not sure if he intended this tongue in cheek, or not, but there is a point here that we need to understand. The Golden Rule, more than using our own desires as the standard for treatment of others, speaks of treating others in the same way that GOD has treated us. God's love, as seen in His giving, mercy, grace and service is our standard for loving others. If He is our standard, then there is no problem with differing tastes.

B) Context of the “Golden Rule”
It is interesting that you rarely, if ever, hear anything said about the context of the Golden rule statement. It is the immediate context of this verse that is of special interest to me. Why is this so important? Because Matthew 7:12 begins with "so" or "Therefore" depending upon the translation used. This conjunction ties this verse directly to the preceding thought expressed in Matthew 7:7-11. As it is written, "Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened. "Which of you, if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!"

The Golden rule was first recorded in the context of giving to others as God has given to us. This "rule" was also a rule in the sense that it was to a certain degree the practice of even the sinful men of the world. Even the sinners respond well to love. They give their children the things that they need (more so then than today it would seem). Jesus' point was that since it was possible, and even the general rule, that even evil men give good things to their children, how much more does God give - being a perfect and perfectly loving Father? Jesus raised this general rule to a higher, "golden", plane in His teaching and example. He said, "Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over, will be poured into your lap. For with the measure you use, it will be measured to you." (Luke 6:38)

But how can we fulfill such a command as this? We must understand about asking, seeking, and knocking. We are the ones who ask, seek, and knock, as listed in verse seven. Such behavior requires that we acknowledge our dependence upon Jesus Christ. When we are in need, it is God who readily gives us the good gifts that are necessary. This behavior also speaks of our need to continue in relationship with God if we are to be loving towards our fellow man. Just as God gives, finds, and opens, in relationship to us, so we need to be sensitive to the asking, seeking, and knocking, that others might direct towards us.

"The King drives us back into perpetual and intimate relationship with God in order that our attitude with regard to our fellow men should be what it ought to be… We must live near to God if we would live in right relationship with our fellow men. We must live right with our fellow men if we would live right with God." [4]

There are some commentators who would say that the "So", or the "Therefore", links the verse not with the immediately preceding verses but with the whole teaching of the sermon so far. I agree that this conjunction certainly does link verse 12 to everything that preceded it in the sermon on the Mount (i.e. 7:1-6), however, to say that it does not primarily refer to the immediately previous thought, expressed in 7:7-11, is to miss the heart of God in this passage. Jesus was telling them to do to others what He (the Son), and God (the Father), had already begun to do for them.

"In this place the King gives us HIS GOLDEN RULE. Put yourself in another's place, and then act towards him as you would wish him to act towards you under the same circumstances. This is a right royal rule, a precept always at hand, always applicable, always right…Oh, that all men acted on it, and then there would be no slavery, no war, no swearing, no striking, no lying, no robbing; but all would be justice and love! What a kingdom is this that has such a law!"[5]

II) The Golden Rule – Mercy and Grace
Luke 6:31 "Do to others as you would have them do to you."

This second context of the Golden rule is one that focuses upon loving our enemies and those who cannot pay back that love. It speaks powerfully of the mercy and grace that should characterize our lives. This record of the Golden Rule is sandwiched between the mercy and the grace of God.

The love for each other that this passage speaks of is Agape, the love that is a choice to do what is best for its object. Morris notes, "There were several words for 'love' in the Greek. Jesus was not asking for storge, natural affection, nor for eros, romantic love, nor for philia, the love of friendship. He was speaking of agape, which means love even of the unlovely, love which is not drawn out by merit in the beloved but which proceeds from the fact that the lover chooses to be a loving person."[6]

This passage in Luke 6 is a picture of how we are, as Christ's ambassadors called to stop the downward spiral of negative chain-reaction relationships. We are never to do to others however they happen to be doing to us, rather, we are to do to them how we would want them to do for us. When someone treats us badly, and hurts our feelings, how do we respond? Do we retaliate in the emotion of the moment? Do we brood on it nursing the root of bitterness? Or do we stand up for the truth and love them? As Christians, we are no longer slaves of sin to be controlled by every emotion and circumstance that might come our way. Rather, in the time between when someone treats us badly and the time in which we respond, we have the opportunity to insert Christ' love. As a result we can respond in mercy and grace towards the other. This works even when there are only two people involved and when only one is committed to doing the right thing. The wonder of this is that even if the other person continues to start the downward spiral by treating us in an unloving way, the situation will not deteriorate any further because we continue to start the spiral upward again.

We have the promise of the Lord that those who are merciful will receive mercy. Let us be among the merciful, to the glory of God.

A) Mercy and Grace Before
Luke 6:27-30 "But I tell you who hear me: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back."

In the paragraph preceding the Golden rule we find elements of both mercy and grace, with an emphasis upon mercy. We see that we are to be merciful to others, not inflicting retribution nor demanding payment, as we would want others to be merciful to us if we were in a similar situation.

B) Grace and Mercy After
Luke 6:32-37 "If you love those who love you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' love those who love them. And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' do that. And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even 'sinners' lend to 'sinners,' expecting to be repaid in full. But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful, just as your Father is merciful. 'Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.'"

This paragraph which follows the Golden Rule also contains element of grace and mercy but the emphasis seems to be upon grace. Grace is shown to be the giving of something good that the other does not deserve and cannot demand. The citizen of the Kingdom of God is contrasted with the sinner as is seen by the repeated use of the phrase "Even sinners". Jesus asked the question "What credit is that to you . . . ?" three times, suggesting that the disciple must go beyond the world's standard of "do to others as they do to you" and actually do good things "to others that they can't do to you in return." We are to be gracious to others (again grace implies that they don't deserve it) even as God has been gracious to us. And we know that we certainly don't deserve God's love and care.

III) The Golden Rule – Serve One Another in Love
Galatians 5:14 "The entire law is summed up in a single command: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"

The third and final context of the Golden Rule that we will examine is in Galatians chapter five. This statement of the Golden Rule is a little bit different but in essence it says exactly the same thing as the other two verses we studied. Why do I say that? Because to "Love" means to be committed to bringing about the best in the life of another. Certainly that involves the doing of loving things for them, as we would want them to do for us. We are to love our neighbor as we ourselves are loved by God. How are we loved by God? We considered the answer to this question in the last lesson as we saw Jesus, the King of kings, humble Himself to serve. Jesus could have demanded royal treatment but instead He came humbly in order to serve us. Elsewhere, Jesus made another comparison between the truly great disciple and the worldly authorities, as it is written, "Not so with you. Instead, whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant, and whoever wants to be first must be your slave‑‑ just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many." (Matthew 20:26-28)

We need to serve others in the same way, as we can see from the context of this occurrence of the Golden Rule. As it is written,

"You, my brothers, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather, serve one another in love. The entire law is summed up in a single command: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' If you keep on biting and devouring each other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other. So I say, live by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the sinful nature." (Galatians 5:13-16)

We have liberty but we are not to use it selfishly to the harm of others, instead we are to use that liberty to do good in order to serve others. It is by doing so that we fulfill the Law.

As a last word on the subject, Paul warns that if this Golden Rule is not kept by the Galatians, it will result in the destruction of any possibility for their fruitfulness in the Kingdom. The message is the same for us today. The way the warning is phrased, it appears that the Galatians were not being very loving to each other but instead were "biting and devouring each other" and thus this is not only a warning but a strong rebuke. They were feeding the flesh rather than feeding the spirit. This warning and rebuke were administered by Paul much as a doctor would dig out a bullet and wash the wound. Knowing that there would be anger, bitterness, and unforgiveness in the midst of such an environment, he not only dug out the "bullet" but also applied healing salve in admonishing them to live by the Spirit.

The phrase "live by the Spirit" is used to refer to the kind of life that is directed and empowered by the Holy Spirit and evidences fruit that evidences something of the Spirit's character. As it is written, "But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self‑control. Against such things there is no law. Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the sinful nature with its passions and desires." (Gal.5:22-24)

Living by the Spirit means not only going through the day without saying or doing anything hurtful to others, but also that we do those things that help others, especially helping them get closer to God. If we live according to this rule, there is no need for any other law.

Do you see Him (Jesus) lovingly fulfilling this Golden Rule perfectly?




 [1]Leon Morris, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries - Luke, Eerdmans, 1974, 1988,  p. 143.


 [2]G. Campbell Morgan, The Gospel According to Matthew, Revell, 1929, p. 76.


 [3]R.T. France, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries - Matthew, Eerdmans, 1985, p. 145.


 [4]G. Campbell Morgan, The Gospel According to Matthew, Revell, 1929, p. 74,75.


 [5]C.H. Spurgeon, The King Has Come, Fleming H. Revell Company, 1987, p. 80.


 [6]Leon Morris, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries - Luke, Eerdmans, 1974, 1988,  p. 142.





Sunday, March 11, 2012

Week 12 "Blessed"


Video is generally posted sometime early Sunday afternoon.
Text: Today we’re covering Luke 6:17-26 dealing with Jesus’ teaching on the Kingdom of God in the form of the Beatitudes (blessings) and the woes.  

 
 Other passages to read:
We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel to our text from Luke:
·         The Sermon: Matthew 5:2-11
·         Reversal theme elsewhere in Luke: 1:46-55; 14:7-24; 16:19-31; 18:9-14, and Ch. 22-24.
·         Other Lists of Blessings and Woes: Deuteronomy 27-28; Isaiah 5 & 65:13-16

 
Other Resources: This week’s recommended resource is Warren Wiersbe’s Be Compassionate (Luke 1-13): Let the World Know That Jesus Cares; These “Be…” books have been around for a long time and were recently re-released by David C. Cook Publishing. Wiersbe’s writing is accessible and inspiring. He is especially gifted at seeing the memorable outline in the text and writes with a pastor’s heart.

 
Sermon Notes: "A King and His Inverted Kingdom"
(Luke 6:17-26)
“Looking at his disciples, he said:
  • Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.
  • Blessed are you who hunger now, for you will be satisfied.
  • Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh.
  • Blessed are you when men hate you, when they exclude you and insult youand reject your name as evil, because of the Son of Man. "Rejoice in that day and leap for joy, because great is your reward in heaven. For that is how their fathers treated the prophets.
But...
  • Woe to you who are rich, for you have already received your comfort.
  • Woe to you who are well fed now, for you will go hungry.
  • Woe to you who laugh now, for you will mourn and weep.
  • Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.”
Read 6:27-38
  • Kingdom Generosity goes beyond the world’s reasons for giving.
  • Kingdom Generosity is a reflection of God’s Generosity.
Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
  • How is this message similar to Matthew 5 and how is it different? How can we adequately explain the differences?
  • Are the “blessings” for now or for later (i.e., present or future tense)? How does this impact our understanding of “blessing” and “woe”?
  • What’s wrong with “laughing” (v. 21)? What can we learn about this from the context?
  • Why is it that that Jesus can call those poor, hungry, mournful, soon to be outcasts, “blessed”?
  • How would a message like this have been received by the marginalized in Jesus’ time? By those in power? Is this message one that “keeps people down” or truly sets them free?
  • Can you find the other beatitudes (“blessed is/are”) spoken by Jesus in Luke? (There are at least six!)
Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater application of what we learn about Jesus…

  • Where are we in this passage? What best describes our lives?
  • Are the things we are striving after, the very things that Jesus ties to “woes”?
  • In what do we place our trust and our hope for the future?
  • Are we self-sufficient and self-assured or do we realize our need for a Savior?
  • How do we measure the “blessedness” of our lives? Is it the way Jesus measures?
  • How can we extend the message of hope to the marginalized in our own society?
Previously on “Ponderables”:
  • Why did he choose those particular twelve men? Can you think of at least two reasons this group would be a counter-intuitive choice? Most were uneducated and not part of the powerful and influential elements of society. Secondly, apart from Christ, several would most likely have been enemies (e.g., Simon the Zealot and Matthew a tax collector for the hated Romans).
  • How could so many people from such diverse and even contentious backgrounds all gather together in one place? Jesus was the sole focus. They knew their need and that he was the answer. Hence, they were all on equal footing standing before the Messiah. God’s plan was that the entire world would be blessed through Abraham. Now by faith in Jesus we are all family no matter our genetic makeup.
  • If we believe that physical healing is still available today, and we do, why are some people healed and some people not healed? There is no way I can answer this in the space allowed. No one has all the answers. The Bible is clear that we are to pray for the sick, and it is also clear that Jesus still heals....he hasn’t changed. However, the timing and the manor of the healing may not be what we expect. When I don’t have the answers, I default to the character of God—steadfast love and grace—and I stand firm in faith. 
Commentary and Quotes:
While many great speakers often equate “blessed” with happiness I think this is inadequate…especially when we examine the text in Luke. “Blessed” is something greater than mere emotional happiness. While it may contain that emotional gladness at times blessing cannot be contained or even centered there. First emotions are changeable and this blessedness spoken of here is certain and solid. Being poor does not make you happy, neither does being hungry, or persecuted. It would be ludicrous to assume that weeping makes us happy! Secondly, happiness is rooted in the word “hap” which is more like “luck” and is way too random than a definite state of favor we have in God’s kingdom. Blessed is God’s perspective on the reality of our situation. We may not feel blessed. Excuse my language but sometimes our lives seem to suck compared to others (the rich, healthy, and popular) and as a result we conclude that God thinks we suck too. Jesus says, “No!” that God says we are blessed. He loves us and has an eternal plan for our lives. We need to learn to live into the reality of God’s kingdom blessedness. We are in Christ!

 
Jesus was not teaching that poverty, hunger, persecution and tears were blessings in themselves. If that were true, He would never have done all that He did to alleviate the sufferings of others…Jesus was not glorifying material poverty; rather He was calling for that brokenness of heart that confesses spiritual poverty within (Luke 8:9-14; Phil. 3:4-14). The humble person is the only kind the Lord can save (Isa 57:15; 66:2; 1 Peter 5:6)…When people are satisfied with the lesser things of life, the good instead of the best, then their successes add up only as failures. These people are spiritually bankrupt and do not realize it.” (Wiersbe, p.192-193)

 
[A traditional theme, or motif], of a reversal of fortunes was not uncommon in Jewish and Greco-Roman literature. We find it several times in Luke, whether in Mary’s song (Ch.1), this sermon, in the Pharisee’s home (Ch. 14),…”and most importantly, the Lukan account of the exaltation of the crucified Jesus (Ch. 22-24” (Green, The Gospel of Luke, Eerdmans, 264)

 
Luke however portrays Jesus as redefining, both now and for the eschatological future, the way the world works; he is replacing common representations of the world with a new one…Jesus vision of the new world, the Kingdom of God, is
  1. Eschatological, but not relegated to the future.
  2. His unconventional wisdom teaching is designed to jolt his audience into new perceptions of God’s redemptive aim. Because the old ways carry with them alleged divine sanction Jesus is calling for a paradigm shift of colossal proportions.
  3. Words of hope and comfort for the marginalized—restoring them to citizenship in the Kingdom.
  4. Poverty is not idealized…it is simply absent in the Kingdom of God.
  5. Those who measure their lives by old metrics will be surprised…their sense of well-being and self-assurance is grounded in false values. (Green, 264-266)
Rich and poor:
Like “poor,” then, “rich” is not simply a declaration of economic class; it is related fundamentally to issues of power and privilege, social location as an insider, and arrogant self-security apart from God. “Poor” and “rich,” then, are socially defined constructs—and Jesus is overturning the way these terms have been constructed…In effect, He insists, the reality under which you have been operating has been overturned.” (Green, 267)

 
“Woe comes to the "rich" (tois plousiois), not simply because they are wealthy, but (1) because the implication is that they have chosen present gratification over future blessing (v. 24); (2) because rich people criticized in Luke disregard spiritual realities (e.g., 12:15-21); and (3) perhaps because, as was generally assumed, the wealthy became so at the expense of others (cf. James 2:6-7). The same thought runs through v. 25 "well fed"--and probably v. 26--where those who "laugh now" presumably do so at the expense of others.” (Expositor’s Bible Commentary Vol. 8: Matthew, Mark, Luke, Zondervan, 892)

 
Hunger and satisfaction:
R. Kent Hughes talks of two Old Testament passages that give spiritual hunger “lyric expression” …Psalm 42:1-2 and Psalm 63:1. Notice also how many times Jesus uses the imagery of the eschatological banquet throughout the book.

 
Laughter and mourning:
This word is nowhere else in the New Testament but in the LXX it is usually “ironic, flippant, haughty, or foolish.” (Green, 267)

 
“Actually, humor and laughter a good and necessary for the believer. Solomon says that ‘a cheerful heart is good medicine’ (Proverbs 17:22). Abraham Lincoln said, ‘If I did not laugh, I would die.’…What Jesus assaulted is the superficial, shallow mirth that characterizes the world—the inability to weep at the right things, and the ability to laugh at the wrong things.” (R. Kent Hughes, Luke, Vol. 1, 219)

 
“…Those who weep are blessed because they recognize the depth of their sin and allow their hearts to be broken by it. Their tears are a testimony to the painful honesty that confession demands, just as they are the tangible proof of the overflowing joy of knowing his forgiveness. Jesus’ blessing is an encouragement to offer God what he wants most from us: our broken spirits and contrite hearts (Ps. 51).” (Michael Card, Luke: Gospel of Amazement, IVP, 90)

 
“We are called to weep over lost souls, over people who will go into eternal darkness without Christ. We are to weep over the worlds misery, over the injustice that falls on so many helpless people, over the unfairness that victimizes the weak, over child abuse, over battered women, over adultery, over divorce, over betrayals, over rejection, over loneliness, over those who now laugh but who, unless they turn to Christ, will suffer God’s condemnation forever.
     We weep now but look forward to the eternal joy that will be ours in heaven because of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.” (R. Kent Hughes, 220)

 
Popularity and persecution:
“Jesus tells us ‘Woe to you when all men speak well of you.’ This cannot happen to a Christian apart from some sacrifice of principle. Yes, we should be well thought of by “outsiders” (1 Timothy 3:7), but that is different from universal popularity…The desire for popularity can become a self-focused spiritual anesthetic.
     A person who is persecuted because of Christ is truly alive. There is an old saying: ‘Even a dead dog can swim with the tide.’ To swim against the tide you must be alive and kicking. Being yes-men and yes-women of ungodly culture means drifting with the dead.” (R. Kent Hughes, 222)

 
"God’s people, past (1:71) and future (21:17), may expect nothing less than hate and rejection, just as, according to widely held social norms, sinners, the diseased, and others are excluded from full social discourse (5:1-6:11). Because these social norms are not only pervasive but also presumed to be rooted in God’s will, within that symbolic world banishment would have been [evidence that they had been cursed by God. Not so Jesus says…Those who recognize his authority and orient themselves around God’s purpose as manifest in his ministry can also expect opposition. This is not because God has rejected them, but because their persecutors have rejected God’s purpose. The day of one’s opposition, then, is a time of joy…because it authenticates one’s identification with God’s purpose.” (Green, 268 emphasis mine)

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Week 11 March 4, 2012 "Jesus for Everyone"


This week we did not show an on-location video from Israel. We showed the video "Strangers" which illustrates how each life lived for Jesus can effect countless others. We will return to our own video segments next week. The button below should allow you to play the ignite Video seen in service today.

Text: This week we’re covering Luke 6:12-19 dealing with Jesus’ choosing of twelve apostles from the larger group of his disciples and how Jesus ministered to people from any and all backgrounds. We will also journey back to the healings in Ch. 5.

Other passages to read:  this week we encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel to our text from Luke:
·         Choosing the Twelve: Matthew 10:1-4; Mark 3:13-19
·         Ministering to the diverse crowd: Matthew 4:23-25; Mark 3:7-8
·         Other verses: Genesis 12:1-3 (Promise to Abraham); 1 Samuel 17 (David & Goliath)

Other Resources: This week’s recommended resource is Luke, Volume 1: That You May Know the Truth (Preaching the Word Series), by R. Kent Hughes. The author was the pastor of College Church in Wheaton, IL for many years. His solid expository preaching has been crafted into a very readable and inspirational commentary. He is one of my personal favorites.

Sermon Notes: "Jesus is for Everybody"

Read Luke 6:16-19, (esp. v. 18) and Luke 5:12-26
While Pastor Randy only got through the first point in his sermon, we are including his whole outline for you.

Lessons to learn:
  • A Physical healing that illustrates spiritual truth:  Jesus makes filthy people clean.
  • Jesus took care of other people…and He took care of Himself.
  • People need Jesus and it is our great privilege to bring them to him.  Remember, there is always going to be an obstacle.
  • Avoid Religious ‘Separatism’ – quit treating others like lepers. 
  • If you get to Jesus, He will fulfill you. If you fail Jesus, He will forgive you.
Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
  • Why (for what purpose) did Jesus choose the twelve?
  • Why did he choose those particular twelve men? Can you think of at least two reasons this group would be a counter-intuitive choice?
  • Read the parallel passages in Matt. 4 and Mark 3 and locate on a map where the crowd listening to Jesus had come from. How far are you willing to go to hear Jesus?
  • How could so many people from such diverse and even contentious backgrounds all gather together in one place?
  • If we believe that physical healing is still available today, and we do, why are some people healed and some people not healed?
Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater application of what we learn about Jesus…
  • Is there anyone that seeks Jesus out whom he turns away? Are any disqualified from seeking Jesus and being saved by his grace?
  • To what is Jesus calling each of us today?
  • Is there something in your life that is keeping you from answering Jesus’ call to come, hear, and follow him?
  • Are there things you desperately desire Jesus to heal in your life? Write them down. Take those issues to Jesus in prayer. Also, feel free to call the church for prayer as well.
  • What is the key to being a congregation of people from diverse backgrounds who worship well together?
Previously on “Ponderables”:
  • What is Jesus saying about David’s actions in 1 Samuel 21? How are the two situations parallel? Jesus is saying that the issue was human need over religious rules. That is the heart of the Sabbath. David, God’s anointed king refused to take things into his own hand and rebel against Saul. He trusted God to elevate him to the thrown in God’s own time. However, Saul had the priest killed for innocently helping David on his way. I think there could be a subtle allusion here to the actions of Saul and Doeg the Edomite and the future actions of  the Pharisees against himself and his followers. Leon Morris writes, “It is the Son of David who is Lord. If David could override the law without blame, how much more could the much greater Son of David do so?” (Luke, 135)
  • Is there some area where we have become “religious” that doesn’t foster relationship with God? This is not really a question that I can answer for you. Hopefully you spent time thinking about this. Our walk with Christ should not be primarily moralistic, but relational.  What is it that we treasure the most? Is it biblical? More questions…they just keep coming!
  • Like last week, what details does Luke supply, that are not found in Matthew or Mark? The disciples are described as having “rubbed the grain in their hands” (which violated rules about threshing) and in describing the Pharisees’ reaction to the healing of the man with the withered hand Luke says they were “filled with fury”. However, both Matthew and Mark also add unique details to the story…did you notice? Remember, observation is important!
  • What does the Sabbath mean to us today? How should we apply the principle in our lives? Sabbath is no longer a command to us, for it is fulfilled in Christ (Col. 2:16-17). However the Sabbath principles are still very helpful to us today in being able to remain effective for the Lord (and our families) over the long haul. We need regular rest from our work and all the electronic accessories that go along with it! Pastor Randy did a great job unpacking that in his sermon.
  • Read Hebrews chapters 3-4 and ask yourself, “What is the key to entering into God’s Sabbath rest?” The key is not working harder, or being better; the key is our believing or trusting in Jesus! God in his love reaches down to us to bring us into true rest if we will only respond!
Quotes & Commentary:
R. Kent Hughes on the four friends digging through the roof:
 “The four then proceeded to tear a hole in the roof! The typical roof of that day  consisted of timbers laid parallel to each other about two or three feet apart. Sticks were closely laid crosswise upon the timbers, and the structure was padded with reeds, thistles, and twigs. The whole thing was overlaid with about a foot of earth [crushed limestone], which was packed down to minimize leakage. All told the roof was about two feet thick. During the spring grass flourished on these primitive roofs. So the paralytic’s friends had their work cut out for them—they were performing a mini-excavation.” (R. Kent Hughes, Luke Vol. 1, That You May Know the Truth, Crossway, Wheaton, 1998, 174.)
Since our message this morning does not spend time teaching about the choosing of the twelve apostles (6:12-16) we will take a more extended look at that section here with this excerpt again from Do You See Him? Expository Studies from the New Testament, by Greg Dueker.
"Jesus Appointed Twelve Apostles  
A) Who Were They?

When we talk about apostles what do we mean?  As we have seen, Jesus called many with Him to the mountain, but of these, He chose only a few, twelve to be exact, to a special relationship with Him.  These twelve men Jesus designated as apostles, which involved more than being a student or disciple, it meant "one who is sent out with a commission, having the authority of the sender."  To put it simply, these men were called, "missionaries," or "ambassadors" by our Lord.  As it is written,

Mark 3:13-19 "Jesus went up on a mountainside and called to him those he wanted, and they came to him.  He appointed twelve‑‑designating them apostles‑‑that they might be with him and that he might send them out to preach and to have authority to drive out demons.  These are the twelve he appointed: Simon (to whom he gave the name Peter); James son of Zebedee and his brother John (to them he gave the name Boanerges, which means Sons of Thunder); Andrew, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Thaddaeus, Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him."

Luke 6:12-16 "One of those days Jesus went out to a mountainside to pray, and spent the night praying to God.  When morning came, he called his disciples to him and chose twelve of them, whom he also designated apostles: Simon (whom he named Peter), his brother Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Matthew, Thomas, James son of Alphaeus, Simon who was called the Zealot, Judas son of James, and Judas Iscariot, who became a traitor."

In addition to these lists of the names of the apostles, there are two other lists of the apostles that may be found in Matthew 10:1-4 and Acts 1:13.  There have been some questions over the years concerning these lists of names because of apparent differences.  However, there are really no unreconcilable problems with the lists.  Most of the problems come because of the use of one or the other of an individual's names, making it look like they refer to two separate people.  Actually, there is great similarity between these lists, put forth in three groups of four.  In all the lists, Simon Peter, Philip, James the son of Alphaeus, and Judas Iscariot always hold the same positions.

These are the twelve men that Jesus designated as apostles:

1) Simon: Jesus surnamed him "Peter," which means "Rock."

2) Andrew: Peter's brother; led Peter to Jesus; a former disciple of the Baptist.

3) James: John's brother, a son of Zebedee, surnamed with John "Boanerges," which was a Hebrew expression for "Sons of thunder or tumult." 

4) John: Referred to himself as "the disciple whom Jesus loved;" a former disciple of the Baptist.  James and John are believed to be cousins of Christ as their mother Salome may be the Salome that was the sister of Mary.

5) Philip: A Greek name that was not uncommon in Galilee; he led Nathanael to Christ.

6) Bartholomew: Also known as Nathanael; most likely he was "Nathanael Bar Tholomew" for Bartholomew is a patronymic meaning "Son of Tolmai".

7) Matthew: His name meant "a gift of God"; also called "Levi, the son of Alphaeus".  He was a former tax-collector.

8) Thomas: Called "Didymus" meaning "the twin;" was ready to die with the Lord but is more famous for doubting the news of the resurrection, though when he did see Christ, he made the wonderful confession "My Lord and my God!"  Thomas has not been treated fairly.

9) James son of Alphaeus: Perhaps the brother of Matthew (Levi) but because Alphaeus was a common name we cannot be sure; also called "James the younger." 

10) Simon who was called the Zealot: This title may have referred to his personality as being zealous for God, but most likely refers to his former membership in the political party of the Zealots. 

11) Judas son of James (a.k.a.  Lebbaeus, or Thaddaeus): James was also called "Lebbaeus" meaning "big-hearted" and "Thaddaeus" which has its origin in the word meaning "praise."  So his real name would have been Judas Lebbaeus and his surname Thaddaeus.  It is believed by some that Judas was the brother of James, not the son of James; further they would say that based upon the testimony of the ancient historians that James, Judas, and Simon were brothers and "cousins" of Christ on Joseph's side.  We cannot be sure.

12) Judas Iscariot: Iscariot may mean "man from the town of Kerioth," a town in Judea, in which case he was the only non-Galilean of the group.  One commentator suggests that the name "Iscariot" is equally likely to have meant "dagger man" (like today's "gunman").

B) How Did Jesus Approach this Very Important Decision? 
When Jesus came to the place in His ministry when He began to switch His emphasis from teaching the crowds to preparing a select group to establish the church after His own death, He approached the decision of whom to choose very carefully.  The choice of whom we are going to invest our lives in is very important.  The text teaches that Jesus spent the whole night in solitude and prayer, to make sure that He had the Father's heart on the matter.  He did not want to be influenced by the thinking of the crowd.

After praying all night long, Jesus chose the apostles by exercising His divine will (in full submission to the Father) making a sovereign choice.  As it is written, "Jesus went up on a mountainside and called to him those he wanted, and they came to him." (Mark 3:13)

In considering the "How?"  of Jesus' selection of apostles, we must understand that He was exercising sovereign choice, doing the will of the Father, establishing His "cabinet" for the Kingdom of God as represented in the Church.  Yet whenever one talks of sovereign choice at this point, the question of Judas Iscariot comes up.  Did Jesus make a mistake?  Did He somehow miss God's will in choosing the last of the apostles?  After all, eleven out of twelve is a pretty good batting average (.917 for you baseball fans).  Of course we would see that this is wrong thinking.  It is apparent that Jesus chose Judas Iscariot, in love, seeing his potential, yet knowing that Scripture must be fulfilled and that it would be through the actions of Judas Iscariot that prophecy would be fulfilled.  As it is written, 

Zechariah 11:12-13 "I told them, "If you think it best, give me my pay; but if not, keep it."  So they paid me thirty pieces of silver.  And the Lord said to me, "Throw it to the potter"‑‑the handsome price at which they priced me!  So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them into the house of the Lord to the potter."

There can be no other basis for the selection of the apostles other than sovereign choice, for Jesus later said to the apostles, "You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit--fruit that will last."  (John 15:16a)

C) What Kind of Men Did He Choose? 
Jesus did not generally choose the rich and powerful to be His apostles but, rather, He chose simple, common, average people, men who were teachable and who, after spending time with Him, might be able to teach others also.  They were not perfect men but men in whom and through whom God saw fit to work out His plan.  It has been said, and rightly so, that, "The apostolic character, in short, must combine freedom of conscience, enlargement of heart, enlightenment of mind, and all to the superlative degree."  [1]

Yet Jesus did not choose them mainly for some quality which they had, nor for what they were at the time, but for what they might become upon spending time with Him.  For example, Jesus' statement to Simon (Peter) in John 1:42 shows that Jesus was looking at their potential.  They must have appeared to Jesus to be sincere and teachable (except for Judas) and all, except Matthew (Levi) in the beginning and Judas in the end, seemed to have been fairly religious as well as morally respectable.  However, as Lockyer wrote,

"The transformation of the twelve was not the least, it was almost the greatest of Christ's miracles…The application for our hearts in all this is that it is not what we are, in ourselves, when we hear and respond to Christ's call, but what by His grace and power He can make us as we company with Him."[2]

There are no self-made Apostles and no self-made Christians in the kingdom of God--we owe all to His wonderful grace.  The encouraging thing is that what God did in the lives of these simple Galileans, He also desires to do in our lives today, if we will only "follow Him."

D) Why Did Jesus Choose the Twelve? 
Jesus did not just choose the twelve so that He might have something to do or feel like He was important.  Rather, Jesus chose the apostles for reasons that are obvious from the texts listed at the beginning of this section.  It is appropriate for us to relate this to the parable of the grain of wheat, that unless it dies it cannot yield a crop.  Jesus chose the twelve, into whom He sowed His life, that after He was gone and the Holy Spirit came upon them, they would yield an eternal crop of redeemed souls.  Jesus was preparing twelve men to teach others about Him.  Jesus was doing as the apostle Paul admonishes us to do, as it is written, "And the things you have heard me say in the presence of many witnesses entrust to reliable men who will also be qualified to teach others." (2 Timothy 2:2)

The purpose of the Lord was foreshadowed by His use of the phrase "fishers of men" in the calling of the four fishermen--though at the time I'm sure that they did not fully understand His meaning.
1) To be with Him.  The foremost reason that Christ had appointed them apostles was that they might be with Him.  This special calling would eventually send them forth but first they must spend time with Him, learning at His feet.  They were called to a special relationship with their Savior above all else.

2) To be sent out.  Secondly, they were to learn and grow so that they might be sent out as missionaries and ambassadors of Christ, ministers of the Gospel (good news).  When Christ commissioned them and sent them out two by two, they had two main functions: to preach and to minister to people's needs (e.g., to cast out demons).

a)To preach.  The message that they preached was, until after the Resurrection, for the Jews only, giving the children of Israel first chance to repent and believe that the Kingdom of God was at hand.  That repentance was possible and that the spiritual Kingdom of God (where God could reign in their hearts) was good news indeed and many believed.

b)To have authority to minister to people's needs.  Their preaching was to be accompanied by the supernatural and very practical casting out of demons that were afflicting people.  This also included healing the sick.  They were designated apostles, given a message and given power to verify the message by ministering to the people's desperate needs.

3)Twelve is the number of governmental perfection.  Many teachers might have had two or three disciples, some would have had more, but to have twelve would have been quite a statement.  It seems obvious enough to our study that their number was symbolic of the twelve tribes of Israel.  Perhaps this implied that Jesus was laying claim to the whole nation.  Perhaps it was a statement as to the "new Israel" that would be established by the Messiah, certainly it established a parallel between the Church and the chosen nation Israel.  Later Jesus tells them that they would rule over the twelve tribes when all things are made new.  As it is written,

"Jesus said to them, "I tell you the truth, at the renewal of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." (Matthew 19:28)

4) They were representative of mankind.  Although there was not someone from all the various nations nor even from many various towns, they were somehow representative of the human race.  They were not a group that you would have found together apart from Christ.  Not only were their occupations, educations, and goals quite different, but they were of differing personalities.  Lockyer comments,

"For instance, Peter is forward and self-assertive, but Andrew, his brother, keeps in the background and is never obtrusive.  James is like a volcano, but Nathanael is like a quiet summer pool.  Philip always looked before he leaped, but Peter leaped before he looked.  Some of the band were born to lead, others were content to be led . . . " [3] 

For a more in-depth character study on the apostles, Lockyer's book entitled All the Apostles of the Bible would be an excellent place to start.  Although I do not agree with all that has been assumed or hypothesized about the personalities of the various apostles, this book contains much interesting information."



[1]   A.B. Bruce, The Training of the Twelve, Eerdmans, 1894, 1971,1988, 14.
[2]   Herbert Lockyer, All the Apostles of the Bible, Zondervan, 1972, 11.
[3]   Herbert Lockyer, All the Apostles of the Bible, Zondervan, 1972, 16.