Jesus for Everyone

This blog is to supplement the current teaching series through the Gospel of Luke at Beaverton Foursquare Church, in Beaverton, Oregon. We are providing weekly self-study/digging deeper questions for those desiring to go beyond the scope of the sermon in your exploration of the complete passage. We are also providing links to the sermon introduction videos filmed for this series on-location in Israel. Our prayer is that we can better learn how to live and love like Jesus this year!

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Happy Thanksgiving!


This weekend as we celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday, our teaching will not part of our series from the Gospel of Luke. Instead, Pastor Grant will be bringing a message from John Chapter 1.

For those of you out of town with family, Pastor Randy led our traditional Thursday morning Thanksgiving Service with a look back at the healing of the 10 Lepers in Luke 17:11-19  (which we covered a few weeks ago) as we entered into a time of Communion.
His devotional teaching called "The Returner" on how:
  1. Gratitude generates generosity.
  2. Ingratitude can shut something down.
  3. Unexpressed gratitude Is interpreted as ingratitude (and has the same result as rejection).
Borrowing a line from And Stanley, that had spurred Pastor Randy's thinking recently,
"A returner is a person who goes back to say thanks, which enables him to go forward."
We will be back next week with another teaching and video filmed on location in Jerusalem. Then we will be saving the rest of our Luke teachings to use in March in a run up to Resurrection Day entitled "Jesus’ Passion For Everyone". After the new year, we will begin studying through Ephesians...an important series for the church. Then after finishing our Luke series during the time surrounding Lent, Palm Sunday, and Easter we will travel back to Ephesus and spend spring there! We hope you will join with us in the journey!

In the spirit of gratitude, I am including the following Thanksgiving-related poem,
 
          November
 
November's chill wind
Strips away
Autumn's bright wrappings.
Temporary, beautiful things
Leaves, flowers,
Even the birds, are gone
Revealing iron-grey skies
Encroaching winter.
 
November's diluting rain
Tones down the brightness,
Color of creation,
Removing distractions
That we might take a moment
To be thankful for the important,
Eternal things that remain--
God our Savior, Shepherd,
Family, friends, memories of
What God has done
In our lives.
 
November's early darkness,
A time to nestle down cozily
As best we can.
A terrible lonely, homesick time
If we live separated
From what is
Truly important.
 
Gratitude leads us home.
 
                                  © Greg K. Dueker

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Week 39 The Vineyard Revisited


 


We have no video this week

Text: This week we’re skipping ahead since we covered the Triumphal Entry and the cleansing of the temple last spring on Palm Sunday and Easter (notes and videos are still on the blogs), and will be covering Luke 20:1-19 where Jesus’ authority is questioned by the priest and scribes and then the section where Jesus taught another parable to the people about a man who planted a vineyard, rented it out, and was unable to collect rent from the wicked tenants. This parable is usually called “The Parable of the Wicked Tenants”, but this title might cause us to miss Jesus’ point.

 
Other passages to read: We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel or provide background information to our text from Luke 20:
·           Authority of Jesus challenged: vv 1-8; Matthew 21:23-27; Mark 11:27-33
·           Whole parable: vv 9-16; Matthew 21:33-46; Mark 12:1-12
·           Vineyard Imagery: Psalm 80:8-9; Isaiah 5:1-6; 27:2-4; Hosea 9:10; 10:1-2
·           Many messengers sent (some persecuted): 2 Chron. 24:19; Jer. 25:4-7
·           Death of the Son: Repeated message in Luke 9:22, 44; 18:31-34
·           Stone of stumbling: Psalm 118:22; Isaiah 8:14-15; 28:16; 1 Peter 2:4-10; Daniel 2:31-45

Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:

·           What “things” were the priests concerned about, what was prompting them challenge Jesus authority? You should be able to find at least three “things”.
·           In what ways is Jesus’ parable in vv 9-16 similar to Isaiah 5:1-6 and in what ways is it different?
·           Why does the vineyard owner show such patience?
·           Why does he send his son? Is he naïve or does he know what will happen ahead of time?
·           What might be a better title for this parable?
·           When those listening say, “Surely not!” in v. 16, to what are they referring?
·           In v. 18 what is Jesus talking about? Is it somehow better to be broken than to be crushed?

We try to answer these questions on the Jesus4Everyone blog in the next week’s post.

Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater personal application of what we learn about Jesus…

·         How open am I to Jesus Christ’s authority over my life? What if Jesus starts rocking our boat? Is Jesus free to be Jesus in our life?
·         Have we ever started to back-peddle from what the Lord is doing in our life? Are we doing so now?
·         If we think about being a part of the Lord’s vineyard, how can that encourage us this week?
·         If we were to think of ourselves as “renters” rather than owners of this life how would it change my outlook this week? What “rent” if any does the Lord require from us today?
·         Will we “fall on the stone” or will the stone fall on us? How?


Pastor Randy’s Sermon Notes: Questions for Jesus 




Read Luke 20:1-19
1.The goodness of the owner
  • “The earth is the Lord’s and everything in it...” (Psalm 24:1)
 2.The rights of the owner
  • The owner has rights. A tenant has responsibilities.
  • Read Isaiah 5:1-5
  • “He will come and kill those tenants and give the vineyard to others.” (v16)
  • “Vengeance is mine; I will repay, says the Lord.” (Romans 12:19

 
Quotes and Commentary:
Due to tending to a close family memorial service, I am not able to post commentary this week, but am encouraging you to do your own study here. I will take time to answer your ponderables from last week! Well OK, here are a few anyway!

·         The Herodian Temple was decorated with the national symbol of Israel…a huge golden vine.
·         According to the Mishna, the doorway of the temple was flanked by two square-shaped pillars each formed of ten cubes measuring four cubits on the sides. On these two pillars rested …five oaken beams, separated from each other by square stones set on a line with the pillars. It was a reproduction of the triumphal arches then so common in the east. Upon the immense trellis, or grille, stretched a golden vine, of which the grapes, according to Josephus, were of the height of a man. He adds that it extended almost [40 feet across the top] (from north to south) and that its top was [100 feet] from the ground. Tacitus also speaks of this vine.
·         The parable in vineyard 20:9-18 has been called “The Parable of the Wicked Tenants, but the main point of this parable is in the center…The noble owner’s decision to send his son!

Previously on Ponderables:
·         How should we interpret and apply the parables, the metaphorical theology, of Jesus? They are not primarily allegorical, unless meanings are identified specifically in the text. Jesus uses stories with real-life comparisons to make a spiritual point, often the opposite of what the audience might have expected. To understand them it is good if we can put ourselves into the cultural and spiritual situation of the original audiences and hear what Jesus was saying to them. A parable may have more than one point…like a house may have more than one window through which we might look out. However, we should not try to make it say something it didn’t or couldn’t have said to the original audience, or that would be contrary to the whole counsel of the Word of God.

·         What about this parable specifically? Is it an allegory, a historical allusion, a prophecy, a pastoral teaching on stewardship, or something else altogether? The answer is yes. It alludes to the journeys of Herod and then later his son Archelaus to Rome to secure their kingdoms under the authorization of Caesar. It does provide some teaching on stewardship (servanthood, accountibility, faithfulness in a little leads to greater responsibility). However, it is primarily a pastoral teaching, though not primarily on stewardship as much as it is it is about witness while waiting for the kingdom/king to come in all fullness! Kenneth Bailey brings out the helpful point that those remaining behind were being asked to do business in the name of an absent king surrounded by a rather hostile population. It was an interesting coincidence that last Sunday was the internationally designated Sunday to pray for the persecuted church

·         What points in this parable are realistic to the original hearer? How do we relate to these points of contact today in our culture without getting “fuzzy”? The nobleman going away to receive the kingdom is right from their own history. When Archelaus had done this he was followed by a delegation that said they didn’t want him for a king. Regime change in the ancient world, was often very costly to the supporters of opponents. The United States is pretty unique in the history of the world in that power can pass peacefully from one government to another. The idea of representing an absent king while surrounded by enemies is very similar to the national history of Israel. How faithful are we to the Lord’s commands to be faithful witnesses until he returns? How committed are we to believing that the Lord is loving and gracious in all his ways, or do we choose to look at things in a way that sees him as crooked?

·         In regards to the economic systems in this parable, what quality is valued most highly? It is not success, but faithfulness.

·         What does this parable teach us about the “kingdom of God”? What does it say about its timing? The kingdom was present in the king’s faithful people…yet the full realization of it would happen when the king returned. This parable would have functioned to cool off the eschatological fervor of the people and equip they for the long-view of faithfulness and the ministry of reconciliation.

·         How does this parable tie in to the teaching of Hebrews 11:6? Hebrews 11:6 says, “And without faith it is impossible to please him, for whoever would draw near to God must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who seek him.” Those who are faithful witnesses in a hostile culture demonstrate faith by believing that the “absent” king not only exists, but is a rewarder of those who seek [serve?] him.

·         How do we reconcile the apparent harshness in v. 27 with the idea of a “loving God”? This is what his enemies deserve…and certainly would have been the cultural norm during regime change in the Middle East at that time. But as a number of commentator’s point out, we are not told what happens in the end. In fact, it sounds like Romans 6:23 “For the wages of sin is death…but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Luke 6:35-36 also teaches to love your enemies…because your Father is merciful. We can guess how this will turn out but we are not told how it did work out.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Week 38 The Parable of the Ten Minas


Family Service this Week!
We have no video for this segment this week.

Text: This week we’re covering Luke 19:11-27 where Jesus, who has been journeying slowly through the land towards the cross, now makes his final ascent from Jericho to Jerusalem. The people thought that surely at Passover Jesus would cause the Kingdom of God’s Messiah to appear. Jesus was aware of this and so proceeded to tell the parable we will examine this morning. It has been called The Parable of the Ten Minas, the Parable of the Pounds (British), and the Parable of Investment.
Other passages to read: We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel or provide background information to our text from Luke 18:
·           Headed to the end in Jerusalem: Luke 9:31, 51, 53; 13:22, 33-34; 17:11; 18:31-34.
·           Parable of Investment: Matthew 25:14-30; Mark 13:34-37
·           King Rejected: v. 14; John 1:11-14; Matthew 22:7; Luke 20:9-16
·           Faithful servants & “Well done” (e.g., pleasing to God): Luke 12:41-48; 16:10-12; 1 Cor. 4:2; Matthew 24:45-51; 13:12; John 21:22-23; Hebrews 11:6

Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
·           How should we interpret and apply the parables, the metaphorical theology, of Jesus?
·           What about this parable specifically? Is it an allegory, a historical allusion, a prophecy, a pastoral teaching on stewardship, or something else altogether?
·           What points in this parable are realistic to the original hearer? How do we relate to these points of contact today in our culture without getting “fuzzy”?
·           In regards to the economic systems in this parable, what quality is valued most highly?
·           What does this parable teach us about the “kingdom of God”? What does it say about its timing?
·           How does this parable tie in to the teaching of Hebrews 11:6?
·           How do we reconcile the apparent harshness in v. 27 with the idea of a “loving God”?

We try to answer these questions on the Jesus4Everyone blog in the next week’s post.

Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater personal application of what we learn about Jesus…
·        How open am I to Jesus Christ’s authority over my life? Do we have any v. 14 moments that we need to repent of before the king returns? To make use of another parable from Luke 14:31-33, make peace with him today!
·        What must I do to be judged a faithful servant of Jesus Christ? What are the character qualities of the good servant in this parable that I can ask God to help develop in me this week?
·        What has God invested in my life that I can use for others?
·         List ten qualities or attributes of the triune God (Father, Son, and Spirit) as revealed in the Bible. This may take some time. Then ask the question, “How do my perceptions of God practically affect the way I live?” and, “In what ways has my perception of the Lord been deficient?” 

Pastor Randy’s Sermon Notes: "A Life Worth Investing"

Read Luke 19:1-27
1.        Your Life Counts
·         Don’t waste your life invest your life.
·         Start where you’re at – hours, dollars, talents and abilities.
·         Leadership begins with stewardship.

2.       You will Give an Account for Your Life
·         For those who are faithful, they get bigger opportunities.
·         For those who are unfaithful, their opportunities get taken. 

Quotes and Commentary:
I am going to hold off on many of these for now as they will give away the answers to the ponderables before you have an opportunity to think about them.

The EBC says, “This parable fulfills four important functions:
(1)  it clarifies the time of the appearance of the kingdom of God;
(2)  it realistically portrays the coming rejection and future return of the Lord;
(3)  it delineates the role of a disciple in the time between the Lord's departure and his return; and
(4)  while it is similar to the parable in Matthew 25:14-30, it makes a unique contribution at this point in Luke's narrative.” (EBC, Vol.8, 1008-9)

“As with many of the Lukan parables, this one draws its significance in part from its realism and in part from its transparent points of contact with the larger narrative. Particularly as Luke has staged this parable, with the introductory rationale in v 11, the parable both helps to interpret and is interpreted by its surrounding co-text. This does not mean that the parable depends straightforwardly on an allegorical interpretation for its meaning. In fact, such a reading would be highly problematic. since, if one were to identify Jesus simply with the nobleman, it would portray Jesus in terms of harshness and exploitative practices. That a nobleman might be characterized thus is realistic on historical grounds.” (Joel B. Green, Gospel of Luke, 675-6)

The New Testament presents three paradoxes on the subject of the coming of the kingdom of God.
  • The kingdom has come in Jesus Christ and it is still in the future.
  • The kingdom is near and yet far off.
  • Followers of Jesus will never know the timing of the coming of the kingdom of God-and here are its signs. (Kenneth E. Bailey. Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes: Cultural Studies in the Gospels , 398).
v. 12 Servants/bondslaves: “Slaves were often employed with doing business on behalf of the urban elite, supervising the sale and purchase of merchandise, handling loans, and the like; the adept might function with such autonomy and manage their own business affairs so astutely that, upon manumission, they were able to replicate for themselves financial structures analogous to those of their former master. “To do business” may be too weak a translation for the practices assumed by the text; “turning a profit” refers to exploitation in the service of managing profitably the capital at one’s disposal. In this unfolding scenario, the amount of that capital, one “pound,” is relatively small, roughly four months’ wages for a day laborer. (Green, 678)
"mina" = 3-4 months (100 days)  wages for a laborer. A pretty modest sum of money.
v. 15 On arriving home he summons the ten servants a second time. He wants to know what diepragmateusanto (from diapragmateuomai)? This is the only appearance of this word in the Greek New Testament. Its primary meaning is "How much business has been transacted."' Bauer lists "How much has been gained by trading" as a second meaning. From the second century onward the Syriac and Coptic versions of this text have consistently chosen the first. (Bailey. 402).

v. 20 The third servant claims to be afraid of his master! But he was more likely afraid lest the master not return, in which case he would have backed "the wrong horse!" As it turns out the horse he failed to back won the race! When caught flatfooted, how does he attempt to defend himself? It is impossible to imagine that when the servant fails his master's test of faithfulness, he deliberately insults that same master. The intention of the servant's speech must be to compliment his master. But how can this be true when he tells the master to his face (in effect), "I see you as a thief." Can this be a compliment? (Bailey, 404).
v. 21 The servant's unfaithfulness produces a twisted vision of the master. Both texts affirm that the way we live influences how we see God, which is the unfaithful servant's problem. The nobleman also points out to the unfaithful servant that he is inconsistent. If the nobleman were indeed a robber baron, he would care nothing about the law and would be happy to have his money invested in a bank and receive the interest. Interest was forbidden in Jewish law. But if the nobleman was a robber he would not care. (Bailey. 406)
v. 24 In the original setting, as similarly in the kingdom parables (Matt 13:12), whether a person has little or much depends on his use of opportunities to increase what he already has. The nobleman's anger (vv. 26-27) is not intended to attribute such behavior to Jesus himself. Rather it does picture the kind of response one might have expected in Jesus' day, especially from the Herodians. (Expositors’ Bible Commentay, Vol. 8, Zondervan, 1010)

v. 27 This is what his enemies deserve…and certainly would have been the cultural norm during regime change in the Middle East at that time. But we are not told what happens in the end. In fact, it sounds like Romans 6:23  “For the wages of sin is death…but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Luke 6:35-36 also teaches to love your enemies…because your Father is merciful.
Previously on Ponderables:
·           Why does the blind man call Jesus, “Son of David”? Because he “saw” in Jesus the coming of the Davidic Messiah. Where else is this term used for Jesus? Only here in Luke, in the parallel passages in Matthew and Mark, and in the Triumphal Entry narratives in Matthew and Mark which immediately follow this pericope.

·           What are the ramifications for the blind man’s life if he is healed? He has to stop begging, get a job to support himself. It is entirely possible he could have been so acclimated to his situation that he would not want to be healed…for it brings greater responsibility.

·          In light of the parallel passage in Matthew, how many blind men are healed in Jericho? Two, of which Bartimaeus seems to have been the spokesman. This is an interesting witness to Jesus being the “Son of David” from the mouths of two witnesses. Is this a contradiction with Mark and Luke? No, neither Mark’s or Luke’s account precludes another blind beggar being there. If there were two then there certainly was one.

·          If you were to make a list, comparing and contrasting the blind man and bad man narratives, what would it look like? Answered in Commentary section last week. See chart there.

·          In this passage there is an emphasis on “seeking” (v.3, 10) but as Joel Green asks, “Who is seeking whom? Jesus was seeking Zacchaeus and Zacchaeus was seeking to see who Jesus was. There is also an emphasis on “seeing.” How do we “see” this played out? A blind man ironically sees Jesus as the Messiah, while the crowd sees the beggar as unimportant yet Jesus then sends those very same people to bring the blind beggar to Him. The man wanted to see, and Jesus healed his eyes. Then the crowds lifted up praise to God. The formerly blind man followed along with Jesus as a disciple. A tax collector wanted to see Jesus and ran ahead and climbed a tree where no one would be able to see him while he was seeing Jesus. Jesus stopped under the tree and saw him, called him by name, and proceeded to the man’s house to have dinner with him where everyone could see that he had been accepted by Christ.

·         How did Jesus know Zacchaeus’ name? How does this knowledge serve to advance the narrative? Of course, it is possible that others had spotted him up in the tree as they moved in advance of Jesus’s procession and were mocking him as Jesus arrived. It is also quite possible that Jesus, on assignment from the Father already knew to whom he would speak and call down from the tree. Jesus' language regarding, “I must stay at your house today” (v. 5) seems to lean towards this being a demonstration of supernatural knowledge. However, it is not necessary to the story. What is necessary is the idea that Jesus’ mission addresses people as individuals and welcomes into the kingdom those on the margins of society whether poor or rich, loud or hiding, men or women, young or old. Jesus is for everyone!

·         What relevant Old & New Testament allusions can be seen in the Zacchaeus narrative? (Hint: There are at least four. Several will be mentioned in a second SOAP journal posting midweek!)The answers are to be found there… http://b4lukejournal.blogspot.com/2012/11/luke-19-receiving-responding.html

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Week 37 "The Blind Man & the Bad Man"


 
Video is usually posted Sunday afternoon!

Text: This week we’re covering Luke 18:35-19:10 where Jesus, who has been journeying slowly through the land towards Jerusalem, now on final approach reaches Jericho for that last steep ascent to Jerusalem. It is here in Jericho that we get to observe Jesus touching lives in these two familiar narratives. Let’s look with new wonder as we see Jesus healing a blind man (Bartimaeus) who desperately sought him out, and saving a bad man (Zacchaeus) who climbed a tree to see him over the crowd.

Other passages to read: We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel or provide background information to our text from Luke 18:
·           Blind man healed: Matthew 20:29-34; Mark 10:46-52.
·           Tax Collectors in Luke: 3:12; 5:27-32; 7:29,34; 15:1; 18:9-13
·           Tax Collectors in the Synoptics: Matthew 5:46; 9:9-13; 10:3; 11:19; 18:17; 21:32; Mark 2:14-16

Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
·           Why does the blind man call Jesus, “Son of David”? Where else is this term used for Jesus?
·           What are the ramifications for the blind man’s life if he is healed?
·           In light of the parallel passage in Matthew, how many blind men are healed in Jericho?
·           If you were to make a list, comparing and contrasting the blind man and bad man narratives, what would it look like?
·           Zacchaeus was hindered by the crowd in getting to Jesus. What other people in the gospels had to overcome similar obstacles?
·           In this passage there is an emphasis on “seeking” (v.3, 10) but as Joel Green asks, “Who is seeking whom? There is also an emphasis on “seeing”. How do we “see” this played out?
·           How did Jesus know Zacchaeus’ name? How does this knowledge serve to advance the narrative?
·           What relevant Old & New Testament allusions can be seen in the Zacchaeus narrative? (Hint: There are at least four. Several will be mentioned in a second SOAP journal posting midweek!)

We try to answer these questions on the Jesus4Everyone blog in the next week’s post.

Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater application of what we learn about Jesus…
·         How desperately do I seek the help that Jesus can bring to my life?
·         Have there been times when well-meaning people have told me to stop seeking Jesus? How did we respond? What can we do better in the future?
·         What am I willing to leave behind as I seek Jesus?
·         Am I more identified with my past, or with following Jesus?
·         What changes will people be able to observe in my life this week as a result of my time with Jesus?

Pastor Randy’s Sermon Notes: "The Blind Man and the Bad Man"

Read Luke 18:35-43
  1. Internal Transformation
·         Trust: Faith always precedes sight

  1. External Demonstration
·         Worship
·         Witness
·         Walk

Read Luke 19:1-10
  1. Come out of hiding
  2. Remove and Replace
·         What have you stolen that you need to give back?
·         Have you defrauded anyone and if so, how will you pay them back?
·         Whom have you neglected and what does your restitution require?
·         Which sinner have you not called out, but only grumbled about?
·         What sins have you tolerated and what does repentance look like?
 

Quotes & Commentary:

The Blind Man
Jericho Described: ”We can picture to ourselves the scene, as our Lord on that afternoon in early spring beheld it. There it was, indeed, already summer, for, as Josephus tells us,6even in winter the inhabitants could only bear the lightest clothing of linen. We are approaching it from the Jordan. It is protected by walls, flanked by four forts. These walls, the theatre, and the amphitheater have been built by Herod; the new palace and its splendid gardens are the work of Archelaus. All around wave groves of feathery palms, rising in stately beauty; stretch gardens of roses, and especially sweet-scented balsam-plantations, the largest behind the royal gardens, of which the perfume is carried by the wind almost out to sea, and which may have given to the city its name (Jericho, 'the perfumed'). It is the Eden of Palestine, the very fairyland of the old world.” (Edersheim, LTJM, 715-716)

Why does Mark Include the blind man’s name but Luke does not?
“Scholars say Mark’s Gospel preserves Bartimaeus’ name (10:46) because he became a stalwart in the Jerusalem church. He followed Jesus, witnessing the Triumphal Entry on Palm Sunday, the horror of the Crucifixion, and the joy of the Resurrection. Talk about getting an eyeful.” (Hughes, Vol. 2, 218)

“Perhaps out of delicacy Luke does not tell his readers that the beggar was called Bartimaeus, which can be translated "Son of filth" (Mk 10:46). Again, Mark records stronger language with the word siopao, which as an ingressive aorist can be translated "shut your mouth …But in spite of the demands from the crowd to "shut up," he cries ever louder, abbreviating Jesus' name to "Son of David." (Bailey, Kindle Locations 2025-2028).

v. 35-36 “In the Middle East, village people show honor to an important guest by walking some distance out of town to greet the guest and escort him or her into the village. At times, the popularity of a guest can be measured by how far the crowd walks to welcome the visitor.” (Kenneth E. Bailey. Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes: Cultural Studies in the Gospels (Kindle Locations 2012-2014).

v. 38 Son of David: The beggar heard the crowd and asked what was happening. The guest was identified as "Jesus of Nazareth." The beggar then began crying for attention using the rare title "Son of David." During Jesus' public ministry, as recorded in the Synoptic Gospels, this title is only used by the Syro-Phoenician woman (Mt 15:21-28) and by this blind beggar. (Bailey, (Kindle Locations 2018-2021).

v. 39 “The blind man’s extreme sense of urgency reveals what should be in our souls. This is the meaning of Jesus’ words, ‘The law and the prophets were proclaimed until John. Since that time, the good news of the kingdom of God is being preached, and everyone is forcing his way into it.’ (Luke 16:6) Spiritual blessings belong to those who ‘go for it.’” (Hughes, R. Kent. Luke: That You May Know the Truth. Vol. 2. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 1998.)

v. 40 The very people who are insulting the beggar are ordered to escort him to Jesus for an "audience" (a nice touch). They become the "servants of the king" bringing a guest into his presence. (Bailey, Kindle Locations 2028-2029).

v. 41 At the same time, a blind man, such as the beggar in this story, has no education, training, employment record, or marketable skills. If healed, self-support will be extremely difficult. Indeed, is it not in his interests to remain blind? The grace of God, mediated through Jesus, is free but not cheap, as Dietrich Bonhoeffer has affirmed.' Is this blind man ready to accept the new responsibilities and challenges that will come to him if he is healed? Jesus' exam presses this stark question upon him.  (Bailey, Kindle Locations 2039-2042).

v. 42 Jesus grants his request and says, "Receive your sight; your faith has saved you." What faith has he affirmed? On reflection, three aspects of the blind man's faith can be detected.
  • He has faith that Jesus has the power of God to heal.
  • He believes that Jesus has compassion on the poor, which includes him.
  • He is confident that Jesus is the Son of David (a messianic title), and he accepts Jesus as his "Lord." (Bailey, Kindle Locations 2045-2047).

The Bad Man

From a tax-collecting perspective, Zacchaeus had it made. Taxes were collected at three places inland — Capernaum, Jericho, and Jerusalem — and he had one of the big three.’...As chief tax collector Zacchaeus was head of a tax-farming corporation with collectors who extorted the people, then paid him before he paid the Romans. He was the kingpin of the Jericho tax cartel and had the scruples of a modern-day crack dealer. He was filthy rich in the fullest sense of the term. Not a likely candidate for the kingdom! (Hughes, Vol. 2, 222)

v. 1 The text quickly affirms that Jesus "was passing through." But rather than turning aside to accept the assumed hospitality of the community, Jesus resolutely moves through the town on his way to Jerusalem, thereby signaling that he is not intending to stay the night in Jericho. There will be no long discussion with the community regarding his future plans in Jerusalem. No doubt the community is deeply disappointed. As Jesus continues on his way, the anticipated banquet is canceled when suddenly, out of nowhere, Zacchaeus appears. (Bailey, Kindle Locations 2068-2071).

Would He only pass through the place, or be the guest of some of the leading priests in Jericho; would He teach, or work any miracle, or silently go on His way to Bethany? Only one in all that crowd seemed unwelcome; alone, and out of place. It was the 'chief of the Publicans' - the head of the tax and customs department. As his name shows, he was a Jew; but yet that very name Zacchæus, 'Zakkai,' 'the just,' or 'pure,' sounded like mockery. (Edersheim, LTJM, 717)

“Let me state the obvious: Zacchaeus is not misunderstood. He is not the victim of circumstance. He is a genuinely bad man. He has chosen to work for the Romans, to bilk his own people. So successful is he at this job that he has risen in the ranks to become a chief tax collector. The people don’t despise him because they are close-minded and judgmental; they despise him because he is a slimy, good-for-nothing thief. And he knows he is.” (Michael Card. Luke: The Gospel of Amazement. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2010. 212)

v. 8 "In that moment Zacchæus saw it all: what his past had been, what his present was, what his future must be. Standing forth, not so much before the crowd as before the Lord, and not ashamed, nay, scarcely conscious of the confession it implied - so much is the sorrow of the past in true repentance swallowed up by the joy of the present - Zacchæus vowed fourfold restoration, as by a thief, of what had become his through false accusation, as well as the half of all his goods to the poor. And so the whole current of his life had been turned, in those few moments, through his joyous reception of Christ, the Saviour of sinners; and Zacchæus the public robber, the rich Chief of the Publicans, had become an almsgiver." (Edersheim, LTJM, 718)

"Zacchaeus is the recipient of a costly demonstration of unexpected love. Jesus stands with the oppressed (the blind man) and at the same time extends costly grace to the oppressor (Zacchaeus). He neither endorses the oppression nor ostracizes the oppressor. Instead, he loves him. Zacchaeus accepts being found and by so doing exemplifies the redefinition of repentance set forth by Jesus in the parable of the good shepherd." (Kindle Locations 2128-2130).

"The costly love that Zacchaeus received will be the standard. Operating from that standard, Zacchaeus starts from where he is not from where others may be, and publicly commits himself to begin showing costly love to the community he has harmed."  (Kindle Locations 2150-2152).

v. 9 A Son of Abraham: “a biblical way of saying, ‘He’s one of us; he’s at home in the People of God; he’s included within the community of salvation”. (Byrne, Brendan. The Hospitality of God: A Reading of Luke's Gospel. Collegeville, MN: The Liturgical Press, 2000. 151.)

“Salvation begins here and now ("Today”) as Jesus—and subsequently the Church in his name—seeks out. finds and incorporates within the community the excluded and the lost, rich tax collectors like Zacchaeus among them. The Son of Man has not come to judge and condemn but to seek out and save the lost (v.10). That is the whole point of his saving mission.” (Byrne, 151)

“The message of life-changing costly love is demonstrated. Financial oppression on the community is significantly lifted by changing the heart of the oppressor, and Zacchaeus is the recipient of compassion on many levels…Jesus demonstrates compassion to both the oppressed (the blind man) and the oppressor (Zacchaeus).” (Bailey. Kindle Locations 2194-2195) 

The Blind Man and the Bad Man Compared & Contrasted
Bartimaeus
Zacchaeus
Blind Man Who Sees
Outside begging
Outcast
Jesus Passing By
Wished to be heard
Motivated by Faith
Unable to See, Calls Out
Crowd Tries to Quiet Him
Jesus Has Him Brought
Cuts to the Chase
Sight Recovered
Jesus Gives What He Asks
Followed Him, Glorifying God
"Your faith has made you well"
Life would be different—Beg no more
Bad Man Who Seeks
Inside prominence
Ruler of Tax collectors (Outcasts)
Jesus Passing By
Wished to see
Motivated by Curiosity
Unable to See, Climbs Up
Crowd Grumbles Disapproval
Jesus Calls Him Down
Asks Nothing
Sonship Recovered
Jesus Gives What He Needs
Receives Him, Reconciles
"Salvation has come to this house"
Life would be different—defraud no more

Previously on Ponderables:
·           What is prayer? What makes our words a prayer? It most simply is a dialog with God. We come to him with praise and thanksgiving, as well as asking for his help. “Prayer, according to the piety of first-century Judaism, was of three types: (1) Confession of sin; (2) thanks for bounty received; (3) petitions for oneself and for others The Pharisee's prayer does not fall into any of these categories. He is neither confessing his sins nor thanking God for God's gifts, and he does not make any requests for help. His public remarks are an attack on others clothed in self-advertisement. He tells God that he despises extortioners, the unjust, adulterers, and tax collectors. Rather than comparing himself to God's expectations of him, he compares himself to others.” (Bailey, 347).

·           What is the proper posture in prayer? Why do the two men stand alone to pray? We should humbly gather together in the community of faith to worship God and to seek his grace for each other. One man stood alone because he thought no one else was good enough and the other stood far off because he thought he was not good enough.

·           How does self-righteousness affect the way we see God and others? It twists how we see everything, from God and other people to ourselves. It magnifies our own blind spots in a way that reminds me of a “Mayhem” commercial!

·         In what way does the kingdom of God belong to “children”? They are completely needy and come readily for help. They fully respond to love shown with enthusiastic love and trust. As R. Kent Hughes sums it up the four qualities of the childlike approach to God’s kingdom are, “Unmitigated Trust…Untutored Humility… Untarnished Receptivity…and Unabashed Love.” (Hughes, Luke: That You May Know the Truth, Vol. 2, Crossway, 200-202).

·           Why does Jesus question the ruler calling him a “Good Teacher?” How does this affect our perception of Jesus, if at all? If none is “good” but God, then why is the rich ruler calling Jesus “good” unless he really believes Jesus is divine. Jesus is challenging the questioner's presuppositions. He is not denying his own divinity, in fact, he is confirming it. Jesus is in effect trying to get the man to really think about what he is saying.

·           How does the repeated prediction of Jesus’ death fit into this passage? It is the answer to the tax collector’s prayer that God would “make atonement” for him.