Jesus for Everyone

This blog is to supplement the current teaching series through the Gospel of Luke at Beaverton Foursquare Church, in Beaverton, Oregon. We are providing weekly self-study/digging deeper questions for those desiring to go beyond the scope of the sermon in your exploration of the complete passage. We are also providing links to the sermon introduction videos filmed for this series on-location in Israel. Our prayer is that we can better learn how to live and love like Jesus this year!

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Week 31 "Faithful In A Little"

There is no video this week...but we do have more coming!

Text: This week we’re covering Luke 16:1-18 dealing with one of Jesus’ most misunderstood parables and related teachings about faithfulness, divided love, and money. Try to look for the thematic unity that ties these different elements of this passage together.

Other passages to read: We encourage you to read "horizontally" in these passages that are parallel or provide background information to our text from Luke:

·           Parable of the Dishonest Manager: Unique to Luke. Re-read Luke 12:42-48; See also 1 Cor. 9:17-18; 1 Chronicles 29:14 & 16 for stewardship concepts.
·           Faithful in a little: Matthew 25:21,23; Luke 19:17; Psalm 33:4; Proverbs 14:21-23
·           Two Masters: Matthew 6:19-24; 1 Timothy 6:6-10; Deut. 6:4-7.
·           Divorce: Matthew 5:31-32; 19:9-12; Mark 10:2-11; Malachi 2:15-17; 1 Cor. 7:11-14
·           Law & the Kingdom of God: Matthew 11:12-13; 5:17-20; 1 Chr. 28:9; Deut. 4:28-30; Psalm 105:3-5.

Points to ponder: In your study this week, you might want to think about one of these questions:
·         How is this parable connected to the parable of the Lost Son which immediately precedes it in 15:
·         Why doesn’t the master in the parable annul the illegal transactions that defraud him?
·         Why does the master commend the dishonest manager?
·         How do we see the justice and mercy of God demonstrated in this parable?
·         In this passage we see a several pairs of contrasting terms. What are they and how do they define each other?
·         How do the themes in verse 15 relate to the rest of chapters 14-16?
·         Why is this apparently random verse about divorce (v.18) included here?

We try to answer these questions on the Jesus4Everyone blog in the next week’s post.

Questions to ask ourselves: The following questions are intended to help us move towards greater application of what we learn about Jesus…

  • When you think about what you have, is your default setting to think of it as your or as God’s?
  • In what ways do you use the assets entrusted to you to invest in others?
  • List at least seven things we know to be true about God’s character (especially as revealed in Christ Jesus) that we have seen since we began this series.
  • Should our knowledge of the character of God effect how we use his resources? If so, how?
  • Do we have a willingness to act on our deepest beliefs about God’s character? If so, how will we do so this week? Write down at least one way specifically.

Pastor Randy’s Sermon Notes: The Shrewd Steward Who Acted Swiftly(16:1-16)






Stewardship = God is the owner of everything that I have and all that I am.
·   We need to realize the only money we have is the Master's money.
·    One day our money will be gone, and we’ll be gone from our money, so invest it wisely.
 
1. Your best investment is in people that you’ll see in Heaven (v. 9)

2. Faithfulness is revealed in the little things – because trustworthiness has to start somewhere. (v.10)

 
3. There is a correlation between how you handle money and how you handle people. (v.11-12)

 
4. You can worship your money or worship with your money? (v. 13-16)

Quotes & Commentary:

“From a parable about money, Luke moves us to actual teaching about money; the chapter will end with another parable in which money is both part of the story and part of the point. This passage contains some of Jesus’ strongest and most explicit warnings about the dangers of wealth, and experience suggests that neither the church nor the world has taken these warnings sufficiently to heart. Somewhere along the line serious repentance, and a renewed determination to hear and obey Jesus’ clear teaching, seems called for.” (N.T. Wright, Luke for Everyone, 196)

v. 7 The steward knew the gracious character of the Master, yet chose to serve money.  In context, what does this say about the Pharisees (v.14)?

v.8 Jesus means to say that he cites this example of shrewdness because it illustrates the point. "This is the moral of the whole parable. Men of the world in their dealings with men like themselves are more prudent than the children of light in their intercourse with one another" (Plummer). We all know how stupid Christians can be in their cooperative work in the kingdom of God, to go no further. (Robertson's WPNT)

Superficially, the parable appears to present a story of a steward who cheats his master and is commended by Jesus for being a liar and a thief. (Bailey, JTMEE, p. 333)
This parable needs to be examined in light of what precedes it. Bailey is convinced that this parable continues to discuss theological themes that appear in the parable of the prodigal son. The subject is God, sin, grace, and salvation—not honesty in dealing with money. (T.W. Manson, writes, “[It] may almost be regarded as an appendix to the parable of the Prodigal Son.”) Bailey p. 332            

v. 10-13 Several lessons here: 1) No servant can serve two masters. (Possessions press for mastery. Seeks to usurp God’s place in human life.); 2) If you have not been faithful in unrighteous mammon, who will entrust the truth to you? ; and 3) If you are not faithful in what is another’s, then who will give you what is your own?

Make sure to read the related devotional journaling (SOAP) post at http://b4lukejournal.blogspot.com.

 

Previously on Ponderables:

·         To whom are these parables spoken? There are at least two audiences. The first audience seems to be the Pharisees and scribes. These stories are told to them. The second audience is made up of tax collectors and sinners they get to listen in on the confrontation as Jesus answers the Pharisees in parables. There is also a potential third audience though they are not mentioned…Jesus’ disciples.  How does that shade our interpretation? We need to put ourselves into their sandals. How would a Pharisee have heard these parables? Like the older brother in 15:25-32. But we should not lose sight of the other audience

·         If we read these parables from a Trinitarian perspective, where do we find the Trinity and what can we learn about God—as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit? We might see Jesus the Good Shepherd seeking the lost sheep, rejoicing over it, and carrying it back to the flock; the illuminating and cleansing Holy Spirit in the parable of the coin; the loving Heavenly Father in the parable of the Lost Son. God seeks the lost, he celebrates over sinners that repent and he welcomes us by lavish grace into honored fellowship with Him.

·         How right is it to leave the 99 sheep to go and find the one lost sheep? Is there an ethical challenge in this parable? Not really. There are two factors in play here. First, with a flock this size there would be other shepherds to watch over the sheep left behind. Secondly, If we look carefully at the text the sheep were left “in the open country” (v.4) where they would be safe from lurking predators, hidden thieves, and dangerous falls.

·         Remember, as we study the Bible, the question we should ask is always what does the Bible say? What did the author intend it to say to the original audience in its original context? This is what it means. The question is not, “What does it mean to you?” So, what is the clear, simple, challenging message of each of these parables? God rejoices over repentant sinners…will we enter into his celebration? To the second audience, “Will we come to our senses, repent, stop wasting our lives as slaves and return to the Father as sons?” As the third audience, will we seek the lost as long as it takes, with whatever effort is required and fully accept the repentant sinner into the family?

·         What does “prodigal” mean and what are two ways it could be used in the parable of the Lost Sons? It means someone who spends recklessly or wastefully. In this parable the younger son does this with his inheritance. But what we don’t see is the Father’s prodigal love and grace! He crosses the line of cultural acceptability at least three times: when he gives the son his inheritance, when he runs to meet the returning son and fully restores him, and when he goes out to entreat the older son to enter into his joy!

 

No comments:

Post a Comment